I am 68 and I could qualify for either. My bank is pushing a HELOC. What are the real trade-offs?
Answer from Jon Howard (HCP): This is a great question because the answer depends on three variables: how long you will stay in the house, whether you want to make payments, and what happens if property values drop.
HELOC advantages: lower closing costs ($0-$500), faster to open, interest-only payments are small initially. HELOC risks most people ignore: (1) the bank can freeze or reduce your line at will during a downturn (they did this to millions in 2008-2009), (2) the draw period ends after 10 years and payments typically double or triple when principal amortization starts, (3) you must make monthly payments — miss one and you can be foreclosed on.
HECM reverse mortgage advantages: (1) line of credit grows over time at the note rate plus 0.5% MIP — a $200k unused line in year one becomes roughly $325k in 10 years, (2) the lender cannot freeze or cancel the line, (3) no required monthly payments — ever, (4) non-recourse. HECM disadvantages: higher upfront costs ($15-25k rolled in), slightly lower initial available amount than HELOC on same property.
My rule of thumb: if you will be out of the house in under 5 years, HELOC usually wins. If 10+ years, HECM almost always wins because of the line-of-credit growth and the irrevocability. For ages 65-72 in their forever home, the math is not close — HECM is usually the better retirement tool. Happy to run a side-by-side illustration on your numbers.